View Single Post
Old 11-29-2006, 03:53 PM   #4 (permalink)
kabeyun
Moderator
 
kabeyun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 685
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
kabeyun is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chris View Post
You could make the arguement that cellular carriers have had a say in the development. Inclusion of WiFi would certainly affect the amount of data packages sold.
That's what I used to think as well (see several prior rants). But if that's true, why can you throw a rock and hit a WM device sporting built-in or supported WiFi? I think it's an anti-PalmOS conspiracy! But hell, I'll be happy if they can just get Bluetooth right.

-K

P.S. And in some cases I want to throw the rock really hard.

Edit: I agree that cost containment for the 680 is not the reason. If so, more expensive PalmOS devices like the 650 or 700p would have WiFi capability.
__________________

Verizon Treo 650
North Carolina Research Triangle
kabeyun is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Integrated by BBpixel Team 2008 :: jvbPlugin R1015.37x.1